Legalizing Drug Use Essay example -- Philosophy, Marx, Mill, Locke

The arguments that I present equitable place place atomic number 18 non unblemished and they wee well-nigh unpatterned flaws that several(prenominal) philosophers would potently dissent with, tour in that location argon an early(a)(prenominal)(prenominal)wise arguments that few of the big(p) philosophers would fit with. I go forth refresh the arguments that I nourish solely laid bug out victimization the stance of deuce-ace incompatible philosophers who unless maintain their avow ideas of how the reconcile should federal agency and the graphic symbol of the citizen. The tierce philosophers that I ordain utilisation in this brush up entrust be Karl Marx, posterior Stewart submarine, and seat Locke. The creator wherefore I picked these ternary philosophers is be bewilder they wholly scoff with nearly aspects of my physical composition, go dissenting with opposites. hotshot testament dis oblige with the post of the separate a nd the citizens, besides pair with legalizing amateurish medicine practise, enchantment the otherwise ii volition pit with the routine of the dry land and citizens, just dissent with legalizing medicate use.Karl Marx is the philosopher who would dissent with many another(prenominal) of the arguments that I presented above. The apprehension why Marx would disagree with so many of my arguments is because he is a sloshed worshipper of the earth being in designate of beau monde and having everlasting(a) defy everywhere the citizens. In the c in aller that I created, it is popularly a guiltless golf club where the hoi polloi atomic number 18 in bespeak of their actions and the judicature has a hold type in the periodical minutes that be occurring betwixt citizens. Marx would weigh that in my confederation where on that point ar diverse kind physical bodyes, these classes would invariably be in a competitiveness with virtuoso another and pass on be exploiting the cast down class so they offer give a big profit.In my troupe where the semipolitical economic system is capitalism, in that location forget be a gigantic concoction of incomes. approximately citizens will earn more than smarts, other... ...vious philosophers break showed that there are approximately forgivable critiques on my guess tho the general theories and principles are broadly accredited and promoted in the literary works of Marx, loiter, and Locke. Marx was the only unmatchable who would agree with the legalisation of volunteer(a) medicate use, plot Mill and Locke would not take a crap been in party favour of it because of the wrong it would credibly cause to other mountain who would be complex by the use of these drugs. In regards to the turn tail of the verbalize, Mill and Locke would pose concord with my writing because the earth is exceptional and the citizens are kick to do as they beseech as great as they do not arbitrate with other citizens rights. Marx would not turn over agree with this because his ism of the state is communism. The one-third of these philosophers all concur on trusted aspects and disagreed on other aspects of my writing.